Carried in 0.1% of Morrisons's products. Most often listed in rice based drinks (13% of products in that category list it).
Safflower oil is a refined vegetable oil used in dressings, frying, and packaged foods because it is neutral-tasting and relatively inexpensive. The evidence does not support a simple yes-or-no answer to whether it is bad for you. The main distinctions are what it replaces in the diet, whether it is high-linoleic or high-oleic, and how hard it is heated or reused.
This is the strongest pro-safflower claim, but it is still mainly a substitution story. Controlled feeding trials and broader unsaturated-fat evidence suggest safflower oil can lower LDL and total cholesterol when it replaces fats richer in saturated fat, such as butter or some tropical oils. The catch is that safflower-specific trials are not as large or numerous as the canola or olive oil literature, and they usually measure blood lipids over weeks rather than long-term cardiovascular events. The defensible claim is improved risk markers under the right swap, not that safflower oil is a stand-alone health food.
This is the biggest online fear around regular high-linoleic safflower oil. The mechanism sounds plausible because linoleic acid can feed into inflammatory pathways, but human trial evidence does not cleanly show that increasing linoleic acid intake raises CRP, IL-6, or similar markers in a consistent way. That does not prove all omega-6-heavy diets are harmless in every context, especially when they travel with excess calories and ultra-processed food patterns. It does mean the simple claim that safflower oil straightforwardly causes inflammation is stronger than the current human evidence supports.
This is where variety matters. High-linoleic safflower oil and high-oleic safflower oil are not nutritionally identical for cooking performance, and treating them as interchangeable overstates what the label alone tells you. High-oleic versions are richer in monounsaturated fat and generally hold up better in frying and other high-heat applications, while regular high-linoleic versions are more chemically fragile. The evidence here is mostly food-science and stability research rather than long-term human outcome trials, so the claim should stay focused on heat handling, not exaggerated into direct disease predictions.
This concern is more evidence-based than the generic seed-oil panic. Heating studies consistently show rising peroxide values, aldehydes, polymers, and other oxidation markers when safflower oil is kept hot for long periods or reused across multiple frying cycles. The problem is more pronounced for high-linoleic oils than for higher-oleic variants. That is still not the same as proving a specific disease effect from a single home-cooked meal, because much of this literature measures chemistry rather than clinical endpoints. But repeated deep-fryer-style use is a meaningfully different exposure from fresh, ordinary cooking.
Refining changes flavor, color, smoke point, and some minor compounds, which is a fair reason for some people to prefer less processed oils. But direct human evidence showing that refined safflower oil is harmful simply because it is industrially processed is limited. Online arguments often collapse several different concerns into one bucket: refining, omega-6 content, ultra-processed foods, restaurant frying, and overall diet quality. That bundle can sound compelling without proving the narrow claim. If your objection is about degree of processing, that is partly a food-values choice rather than a clearly established clinical harm from safflower oil itself.
Overheating unsaturated oils can produce small amounts of trans isomers and other breakdown products, but that is not the same exposure pattern as the old food-supply problem caused by partially hydrogenated oils. Normal home cooking does not appear to turn safflower oil into a major trans-fat source on the scale seen before industrial trans-fat reformulation. The more evidence-based concern remains oxidation during prolonged, repeated, high-temperature use, especially for high-linoleic safflower oil. So the alarmist version of this claim is not well supported, even though badly abused frying oil is still something to avoid.
This is the most useful reality check. Across fat-substitution trials, the main health signal comes from what a fat replaces and from the broader diet pattern, not from attaching a pure good-or-bad label to one bottle of oil. Swapping saturated fat for unsaturated fat can improve lipid markers, but that does not cancel out a diet built around excess calories, frequent deep-fried foods, and ultra-processed meals. Safflower oil is not a magic health food, and it is also rarely the main driver of risk by itself. Pattern, dose, and cooking practice usually matter more than ideology.
This is editorial summary, not medical advice. If you have cardiovascular disease, lipid disorders, digestive conditions, or are making therapeutic diet changes, speak to a qualified clinician or registered dietitian before treating any single ingredient as the answer.Last hand-reviewed: 2026-05-01